Skip to content

DOC: Update the read_csv in action in cookbook.rst #60866

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

star1327p
Copy link
Contributor

In cookbook.rst, let's update the read_csv in action to a recently written Datacamp tutorial:
https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/pandas-read-csv

The old link not only does not work, but also refers to pandas v0.10 (an outdated version).
https://wesmckinney.com/blog/update-on-upcoming-pandas-v0-10-new-file-parser-other-performance-wins/

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the GitHub issue number)
  • Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
  • All code checks passed.
  • Added type annotations to new arguments/methods/functions.
  • Added an entry in the latest doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

@mroeschke mroeschke added the Docs label Feb 6, 2025
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 3.0 milestone Feb 6, 2025
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit 3979e95 into pandas-dev:main Feb 6, 2025
10 checks passed
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @star1327p

If you're interested, we have this issue regarding running sphinx's linkcheck in CI and reporting failures (similar to what you're fixing). We have a disabled job to run linkcheck but just need to write out the failures to an issue .github/workflows/broken-linkcheck.yml

@star1327p
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mroeschke Thank you for the suggestion! However, I don't think I know enough about sphinx and CI to do so.

@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

No worries. Thanks for all your fixes regardless!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants