BLD: Send Travis-CI results to ScatterCI #5893
Conversation
|
sounds interesting and useful. I can't promise immediate action but if you provide a brief howto and the key I might well enable reporting back from that sparc box |
|
+1 ! |
|
@yarikoptic , you've got mail. |
BLD: Send Travis-CI results to ScatterCI
ghost
merged commit
|
@y-p looks real nice.. minor issue...i have to click left of the 'builds | platforms' (and not on the arrow) to open...? |
|
Just fixed it a few minutes ago. Try now? |
|
beautiful! now for the feature request!! you are printing the output on a filed build, maybe have someway to show the config as well (like on a good build)...maybe another icon? |
|
re config, Look again. I'll keep the other suggestion in mind. |
|
@y-p: This looks very promising. I would love to try setting up a buildbot, but I won't have time for that until at least mid-February. Would you like to send me an API key now, and have me sit on it a bit, or shall I send up a flare when I've got some time? |
|
a dedicated CI box isn't required (but would be great), even a nightly cron (if you don't want to tie up a cpu) Ping me when you'd like to give it a try and I'll send you an email with everything. |
|
The error output is kind of awesome 👍 |
|
Awesome! Can I set it to email me or something like that? |
|
I plan to have it mail notifications to a mailing list so anyone could opt in. |
ghost
mentioned this pull request
|
ping @yarikoptic, SPARC builds started failing again sometime in the last week, It |
|
probably just time/personal difficulties... I will try to set it up On Sat, 18 Jan 2014, y-p wrote:
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. |
|
Thanks @yarikoptic. Blind config changes are low-probability-of-intercept I've rearranged things a bit, and the script we use for travis is https://github.com/pydata/pandas/blob/master/ci/after_script.sh Hope that helps a little. |
|
Has Scatter-CI been moved? or is it no more? |
|
its no more... @y-p has shall we say, removed himself entirely from the pandas loop. he felt his opinions were not being hear I think. |
|
i'm sorry to hear that ... learned a lot from him |
|
Sorry to hear this also. I hope he'll consider returning in the future... |
Our CI situation could be better. Travis is great but doesn't do windows or 32 bit, the SPARC
buildbot provided by @yarikoptic lives in another location and the windows jenkins box isn't
publicly viewable. That means 🔴 builds have been going unnoticed, sometimes for months
until it's time to do a release and we inevitably go spelunking through commits from 2 months
ago to find the problem.
Each platform features some uncorrelated failures so grabbing as much as we can will improve
our overall testing coverage.
To address these types of problems, I've started working on a side-project called ScatterCI.
.
You can check out the beta version here:
This PR should start getting travis jobs on the status page and the windows jenkins box already
submits results from it's nightlies.
If you hit problems with the status page, please open an issue up on the ScatterCI-Pandas repo, not here.
It's not a Pandas thing just a service useful to the project.
@yarikoptic, @neirbowj if you're interested, I can send you an API key and have you
and your favorite platform join the CI fun. It should just take a few minutes to setup and
a full-blown CI server is not even required, a nightly cron job would work just as well.