ENH: Restore support for reading Stata 104 format dta files, and add support for 103 #58555
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
cc @bashtage |
|
Seems pretty simple. Are the dta files produced by Stata or something else? |
|
The new test files are produced with a program that I wrote based on the published specifications, but I test them with Stata (and occasionally a hex editor to be sure). I have also tested with a variety of historic files available from the Stata Technical Bulletin and the Stata Journal. |
mroeschke
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
|
Thanks @cmjcharlton |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rstfile if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.I wasn't sure whether to label this as a bug fix or enhancement as support has existed in the Pandas previously, but it last worked a long time ago.
I have included 103 support in this too as for the purposes of reading the format is identical (103 does not support data of byte type).