WEB: Updating active/inactive core devs

[datapythonista]

I've checked with the devs who weren't active in pandas recently to see if they wished to become inactive, and few were happy to become inactive.

Besides to manage expectations of other core devs and the community, this is relevant for the decision making proposed in PDEP-1. With the current proposal, the number of maintainers to have a quorum is lowered from 12 to 11 after this PR, and it'll have an impact if more people become a maintainer.

@bashtage I couldn't get an answer from you via email (I sent two emails). If you'd like to remain active that's totally fine, just let me know.

[datapythonista]

I'm updating the finance workgroup. Wes was the lead but he's becoming inactive, so I'm removing him from the workgroup. @mroeschke I'm adding you as leader of the workgroup, since I think you've been doing most of the work recently (at least approving expenses). If you want to have a discussion with the rest of the workgroup and there is a different outcome, please let me know:

CC: @jreback @jorisvandenbossche @TomAugspurger

[TomAugspurger]

SGTM. If anyone else wants a spot on the finance group I'm more than happy to step aside.

[jreback]

sgtm

[datapythonista]

@TomAugspurger I personally don't think it's needed to have many people in the workgroups. I think having a couple of people to have a backup is good, or maybe 3 depending on the workgroup. So, seems reasonable that you step aside even if nobody new takes your spot, we already got Matt, Jeff and Joris.

Also, in the responsibilities we've got for the finance workgroup now we only have "approve the expenses". Not sure if it'd make sense to include requesting the grants and organizing the funds. Maybe in that case it could make sense if @phofl joins it?

[phofl]

Maybe in that case it could make sense if @phofl joins it?

sgtm

[mroeschke]

Thanks @datapythonista