-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
BUG: support non-nano times in ewm #56262
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mroeschke
reviewed
Nov 30, 2023
doc/source/whatsnew/v2.2.0.rst
Outdated
@@ -566,6 +566,8 @@ Groupby/resample/rolling | |||
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrameGroupBy.value_counts` and :meth:`SeriesGroupBy.value_count` could result in incorrect sorting if the columns of the DataFrame or name of the Series are integers (:issue:`55951`) | |||
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrameGroupBy.value_counts` and :meth:`SeriesGroupBy.value_count` would not respect ``sort=False`` in :meth:`DataFrame.groupby` and :meth:`Series.groupby` (:issue:`55951`) | |||
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrameGroupBy.value_counts` and :meth:`SeriesGroupBy.value_count` would sort by proportions rather than frequencies when ``sort=True`` and ``normalize=True`` (:issue:`55951`) | |||
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrame.ewm` when passed ``times`` with non-nanosecond ``datetime64`` or :class:`DatetimeTZDtype` dtype (:issue:`??`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrame.ewm` when passed ``times`` with non-nanosecond ``datetime64`` or :class:`DatetimeTZDtype` dtype (:issue:`??`) | |
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrame.ewm` when passed ``times`` with non-nanosecond ``datetime64`` or :class:`DatetimeTZDtype` dtype (:issue:`56262`) |
mroeschke
reviewed
Nov 30, 2023
pandas/core/window/ewm.py
Outdated
if not ( | ||
is_datetime64_dtype(times_dtype) | ||
or isinstance(times_dtype, DatetimeTZDtype) | ||
): | ||
raise ValueError("times must be datetime64[ns] dtype.") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
raise ValueError("times must be datetime64[ns] dtype.") | |
raise ValueError("times must be datetime64 dtype.") |
updated+green |
mroeschke
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2023
Thanks @jbrockmendel |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst
file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.