Skip to content

STY: Fix whatsnew ordering #56026

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2023
Merged

STY: Fix whatsnew ordering #56026

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion doc/source/whatsnew/v2.2.0.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ Datetimelike
- Bug in addition or subtraction of :class:`DateOffset` objects with microsecond components to ``datetime64`` :class:`Index`, :class:`Series`, or :class:`DataFrame` columns with non-nanosecond resolution (:issue:`55595`)
- Bug in addition or subtraction of very large :class:`Tick` objects with :class:`Timestamp` or :class:`Timedelta` objects raising ``OverflowError`` instead of ``OutOfBoundsTimedelta`` (:issue:`55503`)
- Bug in creating a :class:`Index`, :class:`Series`, or :class:`DataFrame` with a non-nanosecond :class:`DatetimeTZDtype` and inputs that would be out of bounds with nanosecond resolution incorrectly raising ``OutOfBoundsDatetime`` (:issue:`54620`)
- Bug in creating a :class:`Index`, :class:`Series`, or :class:`DataFrame` with a non-nanosecond ``datetime64`` dtype and inputs that would be out of bounds for a ``datetime64[ns]`` incorrectly raising ``OutOfBoundsDatetime`` (:issue:`55756`)
- Bug in creating a :class:`Index`, :class:`Series`, or :class:`DataFrame` with a non-nanosecond ``datetime64`` (or :class:`DatetimeTZDtype`) from mixed-numeric inputs treating those as nanoseconds instead of as multiples of the dtype's unit (which would happen with non-mixed numeric inputs) (:issue:`56004`)
- Bug in creating a :class:`Index`, :class:`Series`, or :class:`DataFrame` with a non-nanosecond ``datetime64`` dtype and inputs that would be out of bounds for a ``datetime64[ns]`` incorrectly raising ``OutOfBoundsDatetime`` (:issue:`55756`)
-

Timedelta
Expand Down