TST: Make test_hash_equality_invariance xfail more generic #55094
+0
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Going to merge to avoid flaky failures |
meeseeksmachine
pushed a commit
to meeseeksmachine/pandas
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 11, 2023
… xfail more generic
mroeschke
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 11, 2023
…riance xfail more generic) (#55100) Backport PR #55094: TST: Make test_hash_equality_invariance xfail more generic Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
raisesisn't too novel compared to raising a more specific behavior exception like aValueErrorAdditionally, seems like hypothesis raises an ExceptionGroup here now which is PY311 specific (or using a backport package).