Skip to content

TST: use single-class pattern for Categorical tests #54570

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the GitHub issue number)
  • Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
  • All code checks passed.
  • Added type annotations to new arguments/methods/functions.
  • Added an entry in the latest doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

def test_invert(self, data):
super().test_invert(data)

@pytest.mark.xfail(reason="TBD")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any better reason that could be specified here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i havent figured out whats going on here, was hoping to do that in a future pass

@mroeschke mroeschke added Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite Categorical Categorical Data Type labels Aug 16, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.2 milestone Aug 16, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit b6333e6 into pandas-dev:main Aug 16, 2023
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @jbrockmendel

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the tst-one-class-5 branch August 16, 2023 20:57
mroeschke pushed a commit to mroeschke/pandas that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Categorical Categorical Data Type Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants