-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
Added documentation for Named aggregation in groupby.agg (Issue #18220) #54369
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
||
.. ipython:: python | ||
|
||
result = animals.groupby('kind').agg( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you put this in the groupby docstring instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello, How do I put this in a groupby docstring
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The example would go here
pandas/pandas/core/groupby/generic.py
Line 1339 in fc30823
Examples |
pandas/etc/profile.d/micromamba.sh
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ | |||
# Copyright (C) 2012 Anaconda, Inc |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This shouldn't be included
doc/source/user_guide/groupby.html
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,2945 @@ | |||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This shouldn't be included
Added a missing documentation on an existing behavior of aggregation.
Closing in favor of #54563 |
closes #18220