Skip to content

TYP: annotate testing decorators with pytest.MarkDecorator #53794

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2023
Merged

TYP: annotate testing decorators with pytest.MarkDecorator #53794

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2023

Conversation

fangchenli
Copy link
Member

@fangchenli fangchenli commented Jun 22, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@fangchenli fangchenli changed the title TYP: type pytest.MarkDecorator TYP: type testing decorators with pytest.MarkDecorator Jun 22, 2023
@fangchenli fangchenli changed the title TYP: type testing decorators with pytest.MarkDecorator TYP: annotate testing decorators with pytest.MarkDecorator Jun 22, 2023
@fangchenli fangchenli added the Typing type annotations, mypy/pyright type checking label Jun 22, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.1 milestone Jun 22, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit 8b0a99d into pandas-dev:main Jun 22, 2023
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @fangchenli

@fangchenli fangchenli deleted the pytest-marker-type branch June 22, 2023 16:37
Daquisu pushed a commit to Daquisu/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2023
@fangchenli
TYP: annotate testing decorators with pytest.MarkDecorator (pandas-de…
1098cf9 
…v#53794)

TYP: type pytest.MarkDecorator
@code-narrator code-narrator mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mroeschke mroeschke mroeschke approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Typing type annotations, mypy/pyright type checking
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.1
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@fangchenli @mroeschke