-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
BUG: interchange categorical_column_to_series() should not accept only PandasColumn #52763
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+25
−4
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a0d3b44
round-trip categorical pyarrow
0e176b5
fixup for jobs where pyarrow is not present
e709c4c
use importorskip
fbef6c6
set minimum pyarrow version
936e6cd
just type: ignore
2cc5315
raise notimplementederror
6663714
raise notimplementederror
1d27e7d
Update pandas/core/interchange/from_dataframe.py
MarcoGorelli 24a9157
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into categorical-xch
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the reason for using this attribute? (that also seems like relying on and exposing some internal detail)
Haven't looked in detail, but my understanding is that this object is just a protocol Column object, and we already have all the code to convert that to a pandas object?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know, this was already there - looks like it was introduced in https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/47886/files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I know it was already there, but IMO the "proper" fix for the reported issue is to stop relying on this detail.
Because the the test you added only "happens" to work because pyarrow's Column object also uses
_col
to store the original array; if we would rename that internal property (and I would say it's actually a confusing name in hindsight, since it's an array ;)), the test would start failing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup, agreed