-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
DEPR: allowing non-class returns for _constructor etc #52420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7a28708
DEPR: allowing non-class returns for _constructor etc
jbrockmendel 3d9d7cd
lint fixup
jbrockmendel 894ad3c
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 9968cf9
"fix new test"
jbrockmendel 373a7c7
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 9756d5e
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel eb39b47
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel c259ac8
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 0b46c98
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 45c9218
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 0d01eea
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 918a707
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 24a9041
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 0afc695
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 10ded72
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 90cb220
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel c824432
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel d1f48d8
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 99d1770
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 521402c
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel d7c3510
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 97bbb51
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel 9cd4be4
Merge branch 'main' into depr-constructor
jbrockmendel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does this raise a warning all the time, with no option to silence it?
just wondering if there's a way to do this without having to always raise a warning, and if not, if the warning should advise to just use
filterwarnings
to suppress the message because there's no workaroundThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I tried having it check and only raise if _constructor_foo doesn't return a class but couldn't get that working.
Makes sense. Or as mentioned in the OP this could be doc-only.