-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
API: ArrowExtensionArray.value_counts returns pyarrow.int64 type #51542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jbrockmendel
merged 6 commits into
pandas-dev:main
from
mroeschke:api/arrow/value_counts
Feb 24, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
03ca01d
API: ArrowExtensionArray.value_counts returns pyarrow.int64 type
mroeschke 608907c
Address arrowstringarray
mroeschke c4b2e55
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into api/arrow/value_counts
mroeschke b940622
Address other tests
mroeschke 262e062
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into api/arrow/value_counts
mroeschke 5ded922
Further cleanup
mroeschke File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is this needed? id expect pd.value_counts to behave like obj.value_counts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For
normalize
below,counts.sum()
is called and._values
which is an ArrowExtensionArray doesn't havesum
.I think it was assumed that
counts
is a numpy array here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If EA's implement
value_counts
they should also handlenormalize
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For a long time I wanted value_counts to have int64 dtype and get rid of Int64 cases, but eventually gave up on that. So i think at least Int64 is possible. IIRC value_counts is only kinda-sorta part of the EA interface so the exact requirements aren't pinned down.
If the normalization logic can live exclusively here, I think I'd prefer that.
Out of scope, but I'd just put sum and the other most-basic reductions (say, all the ones in the np.ndarray namespace) on EA and let it raise TypeError for non-supported dtypes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you prefer me to put
sum
on ArrowExtensionArray so this works without theif
statement or should we leave in this check?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i guess cleaner to leave this and can do another api change later if called for