Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PDEP6 implementation pt 1: block.setitem, block.putmask #50626
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PDEP6 implementation pt 1: block.setitem, block.putmask #50626
Changes from 104 commits
ccfcb8d
30dde08
d2dfa3c
e4ea519
e160d7f
f7971f0
373a30e
26ab49d
cc7cc5a
0362481
120aee7
7972c08
a16dcb8
25dc26f
d45b312
e4ed811
ace5e05
34a6194
0cfefa4
150fa9a
1cc3f50
3f15670
d0de3f1
dc6c60b
e33563a
37e0520
2dd85ab
24ca7c2
3aed02f
25f0693
0e5fb73
9f56342
9b9e975
2f980c6
044227f
741b37d
c536d8a
142992e
4551855
f6e34ef
01b0c72
d9c2225
6676bad
df740e6
9a54956
8386032
39decb2
7549888
527fa2d
caa35c3
cc1542d
6636a37
492d443
eb8dd0f
90a64ab
272b735
b3f6b93
b8532cc
81bba3c
87922b5
f314dd1
6b5bc73
8cad201
d3b12ab
adc0022
d5bdfcf
37836e5
1a23fe7
dfa8ed2
3efe0a5
cc95eec
4ba259d
c21aa4d
05ffc27
6612690
d1aba37
adaf4e4
f194434
6dc7fd1
82ecca2
a9d5891
0ccb541
aec0c87
72e5609
1455263
d16eea6
25198d4
ba6daa5
9b15bc2
ebd1a50
a835281
908430b
9802696
5ee4ebf
bb37b09
f46f7e3
7df15e9
f323d2a
5f5a6a5
0fb017b
e540404
dce5f36
095048c
0381c62
e04a8c1
a843e30
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is unrelated to this PR, just incorrect AFAICT. (mostly a note-to-self)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this could be changed to
raise_on_upcast
when the deprecation is enforcedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this would also cover 'shift' (xref #53802). I don't recall that being a part of PDEP6. Am I remembering wrong?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh i see there's a new kwd, never mind
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking aloud. It would be difficult to suggest which dtype to cast? I guess
object
would be safest thoughThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in practice i think it will almost always be x->object or int->float
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe - but I'd suggest doing this separately if it's OK, this has already been open since January 😄 reckon we can get this in for 2.1? It should be pretty quick to rebase #53405, can do that right after this one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep this would be fine as a follow up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works for me