-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
BUG: Bug fix for GH48567 #48772
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
BUG: Bug fix for GH48567 #48772
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe this should be
grp in group_axis
?I am not 100% familiar with this code path but there may be a case where this can apply to the Series index?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For Series index the if-statement one line before "is_in_axis(gpr)" gives true. But the if-statement "gpr in obj" is only for dataframes to check whether the group key gpr is one of the columns. For series (and gpr in series index) the corresponding else-statement is correct. The new test cases prove that the result is correct, if the group key is the series index. I checked that it is working with series that has MultiIndex as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed - this looks good to me. For a Series, we only need to consider the case
axis=0
. So when you have an "in-axis grouper" for a Series, I think there are conceptually only two options: the index, or the values itself. I believe grouping the by the values via the in-axis path, e.g.is entirely not supported (though
ser.groupby(ser).sum()
is supported - but that's a different code path) and is outside the scope here. So that only leaves checking if the provided grouper matches the index name, which is the elif block here.