Skip to content

BUG: test for empty input construct #48330

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ntachukwu
Copy link
Contributor

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Aug 31, 2022

Hello @Th3nn3ss! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2022-08-31 14:40:27 UTC

Copy link
Member

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Th3nn3ss thanks for the PR!
However, for this specific case, I think there are already some other tests in this file that might cover this. For example, we have test_constructor_dict_of_empty_lists that similarly tests the construction of a dataframe from a dictionary with empty values.
You could maybe also expand the existing test.

@ntachukwu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great idea.

Closing this as all tests for empty inputs are subsequently added to #48327

@ntachukwu ntachukwu closed this Sep 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API: Specify the behaviour for operating on empty objects
3 participants