-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
REGR: properly update DataFrame cache in Series.__setitem__ #48215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
simonjayhawkins
merged 8 commits into
pandas-dev:main
from
jorisvandenbossche:regr-series-cache-leak
Aug 26, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0f7f932
REGR: properly update DataFrame cache in Series.__setitem__
jorisvandenbossche f8805df
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into regr-series-cache-leak
jorisvandenbossche b567d02
whatsnew
jorisvandenbossche 253a7a5
add test
jorisvandenbossche 2ec2673
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into regr-series-cache-leak
jorisvandenbossche f32ef47
skip for array managet (accesses blocks)
jorisvandenbossche 8c75621
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into regr-series-cache-leak
jorisvandenbossche 3dc008a
update whatsnew
jorisvandenbossche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this skips whereas
skip_array_manager_not_yet_implemented
xfails.Now this test fails with
AttributeError: 'ArrayManager' object has no attribute 'blocks'
since we are explicitly testing the BlockManager values.so it does make sense to just skip.
but are we likely to want a similar test for array manger?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I think it indeed makes sense to skip this test instead of xfail, since the way is written is not intended to ever work for ArrayManager. But so we could indeed write a separate test that checks for the the ArrayManager case (but I would say it's maybe not a super high priority, I can only take a look in the weekend).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no problem. not a blocker.