-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
REGR: ensure DataFrame.select_dtypes() returns a copy #48176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
simonjayhawkins
merged 6 commits into
pandas-dev:main
from
jorisvandenbossche:regr-select-dtypes-view
Aug 23, 2022
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4cb5f7d
REGR: ensure DataFrame.select_dtypes() returns a copy
jorisvandenbossche 8a8f6cf
fix type issues
jorisvandenbossche 0ab19f1
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into regr-select-dtypes-…
jorisvandenbossche 49e86fa
simplify copy
jorisvandenbossche b44350a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into regr-select-dtypes-…
jorisvandenbossche f1d0502
fixup tests
jorisvandenbossche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
instead of adding a keyword in the Manager method could we just do a .copy after _get_data_subset?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, good point. I was originally thinking to add it here to ensure that the manager can be smarter to know what needs to be copied and what not. But since the predicate is based on the block dtype, this can never split any blocks, so I suppose there will never be such a case where the subset might already be a copy. So yes, doing a
.copy()
here is indeed much simpler.There is one difference though:
combine
(used by_get_data_subset
) doesn't do consolidation, whilecopy()
does. So if your original dataframe is not fully consolidated, the current PR keeps more of the performance improvement of #42611. Of course, at the cost of an unconsolidated return value and a potential later consolidation.Either way is fine for me. Doing a simpler
copy()
will also keep it closer to the previous behaviour sinceiloc
also consolidates I think.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's do the copy outside of internals