-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
ENH: Support mask in GroupBy.cumsum #48070
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jorisvandenbossche
merged 12 commits into
pandas-dev:main
from
phofl:groupby_cumsum_mask
Aug 18, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0ca2233
ENH: Support mask in GroupBy.cumsum
phofl 111a55b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into groupby_cumsum_mask
phofl 0fa1f3a
Change compiling
phofl d9b10f1
Change types
phofl 0f09ea8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into groupby_cumsum_mask
phofl a7d918c
Rename type
phofl df4d4f6
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into groupby_cumsum_mask
phofl 3ee7854
Remove duplicated type
phofl ff83f13
Fix annotation
phofl 9deceab
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into groupby_cumsum_mask
phofl bcb5550
Add initialize
phofl 5609150
Fix groupby references
phofl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rather than continue
if uses_mask:
checks we make that the outermost branch? Might help readability to keep the logic in two different branches rather than continued checks within oneThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried that, but imo that reduces readability. The uses_mask is a simple if_else branch, if we move this outside, it is hard to see that the actual logic of the algorithm is the same in both branches (and we have to keep it consistent over time).