Skip to content

DOC: Fix versionadded for callable in on_bad_lines #47792

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2022

Conversation

phofl
Copy link
Member

@phofl phofl commented Jul 19, 2022

@phofl phofl added Docs IO CSV read_csv, to_csv labels Jul 19, 2022
@phofl phofl added this to the 1.4.4 milestone Jul 19, 2022
Copy link
Member

@mroeschke mroeschke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does this render now?

@phofl
Copy link
Member Author

phofl commented Jul 20, 2022

grafik

Seems correct now

Copy link
Member

@mroeschke mroeschke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. Looks good.

@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit f7e0e68 into pandas-dev:main Jul 20, 2022
@lumberbot-app
Copy link

lumberbot-app bot commented Jul 20, 2022

Something went wrong ... Please have a look at my logs.

phofl added a commit to phofl/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
@phofl
Copy link
Member Author

phofl commented Jul 20, 2022

#47795

@phofl phofl deleted the 47788 branch July 20, 2022 00:39
simonjayhawkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
…e in on_bad_lines) (#47795)

DOC: Fix versionadded for callable in on_bad_lines (#47792)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Docs IO CSV read_csv, to_csv
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DOC: on_bad_lines parameter on read_csv is wrongly labeled for the version 1.3.0 when it should be 1.4.0
2 participants