Skip to content

CLN: non-nano follow-ups #47682

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the Github issue number)
  • Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
  • All code checks passed.
  • Added type annotations to new arguments/methods/functions.
  • Added an entry in the latest doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ def format_array_from_datetime(
# a format based on precision
basic_format = format is None
if basic_format:
reso_obj = get_resolution(values, reso=reso)
reso_obj = get_resolution(values, tz=tz, reso=reso)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This shouldn't affect any tests?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

correct; tz is None here, just making it explicitly passed

@mroeschke mroeschke added the Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution label Jul 12, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 1.5 milestone Jul 12, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit de5c85b into pandas-dev:main Jul 12, 2022
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the nano-vectorized branch July 12, 2022 19:19
yehoshuadimarsky pushed a commit to yehoshuadimarsky/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants