Skip to content

ENH: DatetimeArray fields support non-nano #47044

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2022

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the Github issue number)
  • Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
  • All code checks passed.
  • Added an entry in the latest doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 1.5 milestone May 18, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke added Enhancement Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution labels May 18, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit f7dda79 into pandas-dev:main May 18, 2022
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @jbrockmendel

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the nano-fields branch May 18, 2022 01:05
mroeschke added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2022
* TYP: NoDefault

* ix mypy issues; re-write isinstance(..., NoDefault)

* remove two more casts

* ENH: DatetimeArray fields support non-nano (#47044)

* DEPR: groupby numeric_only default (#47025)

* DOC: Clarify decay argument validation in ewm when times is provided (#47026)

* DOC: Fix some typos in pandas/. (#47022)

* remove two more casts

* avoid cast-like annotation

* left/right

* cannot use |

Co-authored-by: jbrockmendel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Richard Shadrach <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Shuangchi He <[email protected]>
yehoshuadimarsky pushed a commit to yehoshuadimarsky/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
yehoshuadimarsky pushed a commit to yehoshuadimarsky/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
* TYP: NoDefault

* ix mypy issues; re-write isinstance(..., NoDefault)

* remove two more casts

* ENH: DatetimeArray fields support non-nano (pandas-dev#47044)

* DEPR: groupby numeric_only default (pandas-dev#47025)

* DOC: Clarify decay argument validation in ewm when times is provided (pandas-dev#47026)

* DOC: Fix some typos in pandas/. (pandas-dev#47022)

* remove two more casts

* avoid cast-like annotation

* left/right

* cannot use |

Co-authored-by: jbrockmendel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Richard Shadrach <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Shuangchi He <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants