Skip to content

CLN: tighten noqas #44529

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 20, 2021
Merged

CLN: tighten noqas #44529

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 20, 2021

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

  • closes #xxxx
  • tests added / passed
  • Ensure all linting tests pass, see here for how to run them
  • whatsnew entry

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

jbrockmendel commented Nov 20, 2021

@jreback docbuild is green here

@jreback jreback added this to the 1.4 milestone Nov 20, 2021
@jreback jreback added the Clean label Nov 20, 2021
@jreback jreback merged commit 7f3e4f8 into pandas-dev:master Nov 20, 2021
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Nov 20, 2021

wow haven't seen green in a while
thxs!

@phofl
Copy link
Member

phofl commented Nov 20, 2021

I think we should backport the doc fix?

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

sure. its just the one line

simonjayhawkins added a commit to simonjayhawkins/pandas that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2021
simonjayhawkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2021
@@ -1849,5 +1849,5 @@ def union_with_duplicates(lvals: ArrayLike, rvals: ArrayLike) -> ArrayLike:
unique_array = ensure_wrapped_if_datetimelike(unique_array)

for i, value in enumerate(unique_array):
indexer += [i] * int(max(l_count[value], r_count[value]))
indexer += [i] * int(max(l_count.at[value], r_count.at[value]))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same question as in the other PR: what's the reason for this change? It shouldn't influence behaviour, but just being more explicit about label-based?

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

jbrockmendel commented Nov 22, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants