Skip to content

error resolution in sas file #43326

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

error resolution in sas file #43326

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pranava1709
Copy link

@pep8speaks
Copy link

Hello @pranava1709! Thanks for opening this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

Line 6:1: E265 block comment should start with '# '
Line 9:1: W391 blank line at end of file

Copy link
Member

@phofl phofl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What are you trying to do?

@attack68
Copy link
Contributor

hi @pranava1709 seems like a fat finger or mistaken PR. You can't really just add random python script files that don't have any impact on the codebase.
Please re-open and re-commit if you have code change contributions to make

@attack68 attack68 closed this Aug 31, 2021
@pranava1709
Copy link
Author

pranava1709 commented Aug 31, 2021 via email

@phofl
Copy link
Member

phofl commented Aug 31, 2021

This is outside of anything Pandas uses. How does that solve any issues?

edit: please read the contributing guidelines

@pranava1709
Copy link
Author

pranava1709 commented Aug 31, 2021 via email

@phofl
Copy link
Member

phofl commented Aug 31, 2021

But how does this fix the pandas function read_sas?

@pranava1709
Copy link
Author

pranava1709 commented Aug 31, 2021 via email

@phofl
Copy link
Member

phofl commented Aug 31, 2021

We would want read_sas to return the correct result. Everything Else does Not help out users. Please read the contributing guidelines

@pranava1709
Copy link
Author

pranava1709 commented Aug 31, 2021 via email

@phofl
Copy link
Member

phofl commented Aug 31, 2021

Then the function already is correct, so no need to add anything except a Test case

@pranava1709
Copy link
Author

pranava1709 commented Aug 31, 2021 via email

@phofl
Copy link
Member

phofl commented Aug 31, 2021

If an issue is already fixed we add a test to close and avoid regressions.

@pranava1709
Copy link
Author

pranava1709 commented Aug 31, 2021 via email

@phofl
Copy link
Member

phofl commented Aug 31, 2021

Add a test checking that an empty sas file is read as an empty dataframe.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants