-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Fixed bug: Dataframe.sort_values not raising ValueError for ascending-incompatible value and Series.sort_values raising ValueError for int value #42684
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jreback
merged 10 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
gaikwadrahul20:bug-fix-sort-values
Jul 30, 2021
+49
−6
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3677a9e
BUG: Dataframe.sort_values not raising ValueError for ascending-incom…
gaikwadrahul20 a84e1c0
BUG: Series.sort_values not raising ValueError for ascending-incompat…
gaikwadrahul20 f50c032
DOC: Corrected line in rst file
gaikwadrahul20 0ed2a01
Changed doc statements and object values as per review
gaikwadrahul20 74ee732
Changed object values as per the review
gaikwadrahul20 9548857
Restructured validate ascendingfor series
gaikwadrahul20 9d394ec
Restructured validate ascending for frames
gaikwadrahul20 145defd
Merge branch 'master' into bug-fix-sort-values
jreback e5cc3ae
Merge branch 'master' into bug-fix-sort-values
jreback 1170905
Merge pull request #1 from pandas-dev/master
gaikwadrahul20 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would it not be better to separate the raises ValueError test and the functional tests?
Also, would it not be better to parametrize the functional tests as follows:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @attack68. I agree, code will look more clean and short. Pushed a change for this, please check.
Also, I was thinking, does it make more sense to parameterize
test_sort_values_validate_ascending_for_value_error
test function withmsg
as a parameter and move code from line 54 to 68 (code attached below) in this test?