-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
REGR: Series[dt64/td64].astype(string) #41958
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -712,6 +712,14 @@ cpdef ndarray[object] ensure_string_array( | |||
Py_ssize_t i = 0, n = len(arr) | |||
|
|||
if hasattr(arr, "to_numpy"): | |||
|
|||
if hasattr(arr, "dtype") and arr.dtype.kind in ["m", "M"]: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agreed, yeah the .to_numpy()
on an EA is the approparate here.
@@ -660,6 +656,15 @@ def test_astype_dt64_to_string(self, frame_or_series, tz_naive_fixture, request) | |||
alt = obj.astype(str) | |||
assert np.all(alt.iloc[1:] == result.iloc[1:]) | |||
|
|||
def test_astype_td64_to_string(self, frame_or_series): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you parametersize over td, dt, dt w/tz & period
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not nicely; the dt64 one uses tz_naive_fixture
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok can you add that as another test then. just to make sure coverng the bases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
add what as another case? we have the td64 case here and the dt64 case right above here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ahh ok.
period covered? if not pls add (followup ok)
@@ -660,6 +656,15 @@ def test_astype_dt64_to_string(self, frame_or_series, tz_naive_fixture, request) | |||
alt = obj.astype(str) | |||
assert np.all(alt.iloc[1:] == result.iloc[1:]) | |||
|
|||
def test_astype_td64_to_string(self, frame_or_series): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok can you add that as another test then. just to make sure coverng the bases.
@@ -716,6 +716,14 @@ cpdef ndarray[object] ensure_string_array( | |||
Py_ssize_t i = 0, n = len(arr) | |||
|
|||
if hasattr(arr, "to_numpy"): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we dont' have access to the ExtnsionTypes here right? so this is just as easy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
right
@meeseeksdev backport 1.3.x |
Something went wrong ... Please have a look at my logs. |
Co-authored-by: jbrockmendel <[email protected]>
This surfaces another bug in
StringArray.__getitem__
that I haven't looked into yet.