REF: simplify Series.__setitem__ #41912
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
simonjayhawkins
added
Indexing
|
can you rebase |
|
sure |
JulianWgs
pushed a commit
to JulianWgs/pandas
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivating goal is to get rid of the Series methods that use
self.index._engine.get_loc, as these are a mine field (xref #41846). The correct method would be to useself.index.get_loc, the trouble being that we are inconsistent about what kinds of exceptions we raise in engine.get_loc vs Index.get_loc (and Index subclasses). This is a bite-size step towards this goal.