-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
TST: run frame/series arithmetic tests with+without numexpr #41178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jreback
merged 5 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
jorisvandenbossche:ops-test-numexpr-frame
Apr 29, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4664afe
TST: run frame/series arithmetic tests with+without numexpr
jorisvandenbossche 8cb686e
make robust for 32bit os
jorisvandenbossche aefcc7f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into ops-test-numexpr-…
jorisvandenbossche 3465b4c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into ops-test-numexpr-…
jorisvandenbossche b1cbe9c
test boolean op warning for numexpr
jorisvandenbossche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I copy/pasted this fixture from the
tests/arithmetic/
. Is there a way to share such an autouse fixture?A
from pandas.tests.arithmetic.conftest import switch_numexpr_min_elements
would do the trick, but for some reason we disallow explicit imports fromconftest.py
files.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i don't think this needs to be autouse if you are using this explicity (which you are), so just put it in the conftest in tests/frame
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is autoused by all tests in this file, I didn't add it to each test function signature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
only thing that comes to mind is defining it as non-autouse in a high-level conftest and then
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure that can work with a fixture as the base function. Because if a fixture is passed as an argument like this, I think it is already what is yielded from that function that is being passed to the new fixture? (it might be possible, but in any case I don't get it to work)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fair enough; its pretty magical. maybe with
yield switch_numexpr_min_elements_non_autouse
instead ofyield switch_numexpr_min_elements_non_autouse()
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I tried that as well (I tried a few variants, and none directly worked), but not fully sure anymore.