Skip to content

REF: handle dtype dispatch in libhashtable, share Vector/Hashtable code #40944

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 10, 2021

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

  • closes #xxxx
  • tests added / passed
  • Ensure all linting tests pass, see here for how to run them
  • whatsnew entry

elif htfunc_t is complex128_t:
return value_count_complex128(values, dropna)
elif htfunc_t is complex64_t:
return value_count_complex64(values, dropna)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't wait for the arrival of pattern matching in python :)

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 5, 2021

can you rebase (havne't looked yet)

@jreback jreback added Dtype Conversions Unexpected or buggy dtype conversions Refactor Internal refactoring of code labels May 5, 2021
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.3 milestone May 5, 2021
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 5, 2021

ok looks fine, any perf diffs? (maybe expect small marginal improvements)

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

ok looks fine, any perf diffs? (maybe expect small marginal improvements)

i expect it to be a wash

@jreback jreback merged commit cfbd076 into pandas-dev:master May 10, 2021
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the ref-libht branch May 10, 2021 14:07
JulianWgs pushed a commit to JulianWgs/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dtype Conversions Unexpected or buggy dtype conversions Refactor Internal refactoring of code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants