Skip to content

CLN: intp_t instead of int64_t for indexers in libs funcs #40475

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 20, 2021

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

The places where this will need updating proliferate, so right now im just looking to see how the 32bit builds handle this.

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel marked this pull request as ready for review March 17, 2021 19:21
@jreback jreback added 32bit 32-bit systems Algos Non-arithmetic algos: value_counts, factorize, sorting, isin, clip, shift, diff labels Mar 17, 2021
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.3 milestone Mar 17, 2021
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Mar 17, 2021

any perf diffs?

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

any perf diffs?

very little. except for a possibly-avoided copy in Categorical, it should only show up on 32bit

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Mar 20, 2021

can you rebase

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

rebased + green

@jreback jreback merged commit 38640d1 into pandas-dev:master Mar 20, 2021
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the cln-intp-libs-2 branch March 20, 2021 03:05
jbrockmendel added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2021
JulianWgs pushed a commit to JulianWgs/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
32bit 32-bit systems Algos Non-arithmetic algos: value_counts, factorize, sorting, isin, clip, shift, diff
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants