-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
BUG: RollingGroupby no longer keeps the groupby column in the result #40341
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jreback
merged 10 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
mroeschke:bug/groupby_rolling_column
Mar 29, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d62a5e5
BUG: RollingGroupby no longer keeps the groupby column in the result
mroeschke d040abf
Fix test for when by is provided and not level
mroeschke 7b45924
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bug/groupby_rolli…
mroeschke fc7c754
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bug/groupby_rolli…
mroeschke e44b882
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bug/groupby_rolli…
mroeschke 8df2043
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bug/groupby_rolli…
mroeschke 03fd8b0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bug/groupby_rolli…
mroeschke 5571a2a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bug/groupby_rolli…
mroeschke ef8e25a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bug/groupby_rolli…
mroeschke 97efdf2
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bug/groupby_rolli…
mroeschke File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is the difference in conventions just a historical thing? might we want to make these match eventually?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems to be historical #32332 (review)
Would be great to have groupby apply match but might take come convincing