Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
REF: move Block.astype implementation to dtypes/cast.py #40141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
REF: move Block.astype implementation to dtypes/cast.py #40141
Changes from 3 commits
648e005
2f52197
aefc462
01941b7
76d1e1c
3133809
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
values: ArrayLike; dtype: DtypeObj?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mypy isn't smart enough for that (we also didn't annotate
dtype
in the code from where I copied this). But will addvalues: ArrayLike
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
make sense. if we move the pandas_dtype call up into the caller we can do it once instead of (block|array)-wise
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then also the
dtype
validation needs to be moved up (requiring some more changes to avoid duplication of that part). At the moment, it's a rather straightfoward cut and paste from blocks.py to cast.py, so I would maybe prefer to keep it that way for this PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could move this into astype_array_safe and use ensure_wrapped_if_datetimelike; would make it robust to AM/BM (though i think both AM and BM now have PRs to make the arrays EAs to begin with)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since ArrayManager already stores it as EAs (after this array), I would prefer to leave it here (then your PR changing to store EAs in BlockManager as well can remove those two lines)