Skip to content

DOC: fix sphinx directive error in 1.2.1 release notes #38806

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions doc/source/whatsnew/v1.2.1.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ including other versions of pandas.
Fixed regressions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- The deprecated attributes ``_AXIS_NAMES`` and ``_AXIS_NUMBERS`` of :class:`DataFrame` and :class:`Series` will no longer show up in ``dir`` or ``inspect.getmembers`` calls (:issue:`38740`)
- :meth:`to_csv` created corrupted zip files when there were more rows than ``chunksize`` (issue:`38714`)
- Fixed a regression in ``groupby().rolling()`` where :class:`MultiIndex` levels were dropped (:issue:`38523`)
- Bug in repr of float-like strings of an ``object`` dtype having trailing 0's truncated after the decimal (:issue:`38708`)
- Fixed regression in :meth:`to_csv` that created corrupted zip files when there were more rows than ``chunksize`` (:issue:`38714`)
- Fixed regression in ``groupby().rolling()`` where :class:`MultiIndex` levels were dropped (:issue:`38523`)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this may cause a conflict (groupby.rolling) as haven't actually merged that change in 1.2.x as still discussing. i suppose we should revert it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point. I won't touch that entry in this PR. was just extra tidying while fixing line above.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kk cool, yeah if revert that line then no objection

- Fixed regression in repr of float-like strings of an ``object`` dtype having trailing 0's truncated after the decimal (:issue:`38708`)
- Fixed regression in :meth:`DataFrame.groupby()` with :class:`Categorical` grouping column not showing unused categories for ``grouped.indices`` (:issue:`38642`)

.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expand Down