-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
TYP: func argument to DataFrame.apply, DataFrame.applymap, core.apply.frame_apply #38493
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f4e5d0d
add ApplyFuncType alias
arw2019 3f85df4
type func arg of DataFrame.apply
arw2019 d2d1b49
type func arg of core.apply.frame_apply
arw2019 6d53475
add PythonFuncType alias
arw2019 05043da
type func arg of DataFrame.applymap
arw2019 6224f0a
review comments
arw2019 7ca322f
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into ty…
arw2019 9cb22ed
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into ty…
arw2019 f613d29
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into ty…
arw2019 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to make it explicit, this annotation will show up as
Union[np.ufunc, Union[Callable, str, List[Union[Callable, str]], Dict[Union[Hashable, NoneType], Union[Callable, str, List[Union[Callable, str]]]]]]
(kind of unreadable, IMO, but so which is not even complete yet, since the ufunc should be present in each nested case Union[Callable, str]. But isn't a ufunc a callable, so that can maybe be removed?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Going off the aggregation case we don't special case
ufunc
there so we probably shouldn't do it here either.In that case I think
ApplyFuncType
is the same asAggFuncType
so we can use the same alias in both casesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah i agree here, no need to be different, let's use
AggFuncType
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.