Skip to content

BUG: Fix Index.__repr__ when display.max_seq_items = 1 #38443

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 28, 2020
Merged

BUG: Fix Index.__repr__ when display.max_seq_items = 1 #38443

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
b0b363d
Handles case in printing summary when max_seq_items=0
skvrahul Dec 13, 2020
bbb19bd
Adds whatsnew entry
skvrahul Dec 13, 2020
cb829fb
Removes duplicate I/O section
skvrahul Dec 13, 2020
62506cb
Adds tests for 'display.max_seq_items' = 1 and 'display.max_seq_items…
skvrahul Dec 14, 2020
d5224da
Merge branch 'master' into 38415
skvrahul Dec 14, 2020
539a055
Adds additional tests
skvrahul Dec 15, 2020
ceefa45
Moves display.max_seq_items == n tests to own test
skvrahul Dec 15, 2020
3191e6f
run black
skvrahul Dec 15, 2020
280518a
Update v1.3.0.rst
skvrahul Dec 26, 2020
4e381bf
Update v1.3.0.rst
skvrahul Dec 26, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions doc/source/whatsnew/v1.3.0.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,8 +75,10 @@ Performance improvements
Bug fixes
~~~~~~~~~

-
-
I/O
^^^

- Bug in :meth:`Index.__repr__` when ``display.max_seq_items=1`` (:issue:`38415`)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you undo this

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Have reverted the changes.

Categorical
^^^^^^^^^^^
Expand Down
6 changes: 5 additions & 1 deletion pandas/io/formats/printing.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -382,7 +382,11 @@ def best_len(values: List[str]) -> int:
summary = f"[{first}, {last}]{close}"
else:

if n > max_seq_items:
if max_seq_items == 1:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you also cover in a test the max_seq_items == 0 case (I think we have this but maybe not). Also pls confirm that we have a test for n == max_seq_items.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like we don't have a test for n == max_seq_items. Will cover these in my tests.

Just wanted to confirm that this is the relevant location for adding these?

pandas/pandas/tests/indexes/multi/test_formats.py

Lines 92 to 119 in e2dec8d

def test_repr(self, idx):
result = idx[:1].__repr__()
expected = """\
MultiIndex([('foo', 'one')],
names=['first', 'second'])"""
assert result == expected
result = idx.__repr__()
expected = """\
MultiIndex([('foo', 'one'),
('foo', 'two'),
('bar', 'one'),
('baz', 'two'),
('qux', 'one'),
('qux', 'two')],
names=['first', 'second'])"""
assert result == expected
with pd.option_context("display.max_seq_items", 5):
result = idx.__repr__()
expected = """\
MultiIndex([('foo', 'one'),
('foo', 'two'),
...
('qux', 'one'),
('qux', 'two')],
names=['first', 'second'], length=6)"""
assert result == expected

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah there plus some generic Index ones (look in pandas/tests/indexes/); you may have to grep around a bit

e.g.

~/pandas-dev$ grep -r max_seq_items pandas/tests/
pandas/tests/io/formats/test_format.py:        with option_context("display.max_seq_items", 2000):
pandas/tests/io/formats/test_format.py:        with option_context("display.max_seq_items", 5):
pandas/tests/groupby/test_groupby.py:    "max_seq_items, expected",
pandas/tests/groupby/test_groupby.py:def test_groups_repr_truncates(max_seq_items, expected):
pandas/tests/groupby/test_groupby.py:    with pd.option_context("display.max_seq_items", max_seq_items):
pandas/tests/indexes/multi/test_formats.py:    with pd.option_context("display.max_seq_items", None):
pandas/tests/indexes/multi/test_formats.py:        with pd.option_context("display.max_seq_items", 5):
pandas/tests/indexes/common.py:        with pd.option_context("display.max_seq_items", None):
pandas/tests/indexes/base_class/test_formats.py:        with cf.option_context("display.max_seq_items", 10):

i think pandas/tests/indexes/base_class/test_formats.py: with cf.option_context("display.max_seq_items", 10):
has a number of tests as well

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we have a case of max_seq_items==0 ? (I think this is a valid value), < 0 is restricted i am pretty sure?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes we do. Max_seq_items ==0 implies unlimited if I'm not mistaken

# If max_seq_items=1 show only last element
head = []
tail = [formatter(x) for x in obj[-1:]]
elif n > max_seq_items:
n = min(max_seq_items // 2, 10)
head = [formatter(x) for x in obj[:n]]
tail = [formatter(x) for x in obj[-n:]]
Expand Down