-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
ENH: Arrow backed string array - implement factorize() method without casting to objects #38007
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jorisvandenbossche
merged 15 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
simonjayhawkins:factorize
Mar 2, 2021
Merged
Changes from 14 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c53a3c2
moreless copy/paste from fletcher
simonjayhawkins b7d0ab8
use docstring from base class
simonjayhawkins 154496a
remove redundant type check
simonjayhawkins c545970
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into factorize
simonjayhawkins 6e3aac8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into factorize
simonjayhawkins 73c7de9
ignore new mypy error
simonjayhawkins 42ca9c3
update algorithms.Factorize.time_factorize
simonjayhawkins a251537
test for arrays with 2 chunks
simonjayhawkins dbc8253
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into factorize
simonjayhawkins ea59c38
fix failing test_factorize_equivalence
simonjayhawkins 7d98727
fix failing test_factorize_empty
simonjayhawkins 0023f08
address dtype comment
simonjayhawkins 6a28414
move ArrowStringDtype import inside try/except
simonjayhawkins c4db20d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into factorize
simonjayhawkins 88ab4f4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into factorize
simonjayhawkins File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wondering, is the
int64
needed here? (pyarrow will typically use int32 as default I think)I suppose that we always return
int64
fromfactorize
for the indices. Short-term, casting to int64 might be best then (to ensure nothing else breaks because of not doing that), but long term we should maybe check if internally we require int64 or would be fine with int32 as well.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
refactor in 0023f08 partially to address comments
but yes, we seem to be getting an int32 from pyarrow
also we could maybe work with numpy arrays here directly for the indices instead of pandas Series?