Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
REF: Back IntervalArray by array instead of Index #36310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
REF: Back IntervalArray by array instead of Index #36310
Changes from all commits
8987a0e
153c87a
8164099
d545dac
6050ec8
bd6231c
548efe6
124938e
c479e0a
c4a2229
97a0bed
bfa13bb
b45ed46
e6d4bd9
266512f
f16be73
4efdc08
1ed9623
ed6a932
fee70d8
1a22095
490a8f5
865b3fc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Above we are first ensuring that the arrays passed to
_simple_new
are an index, and then we extract the array again. Is this roundtrip to index and back needed?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can avoid the roundtrip eventually, will be best accomplished by being stricter in what we pass to _simple_new
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good, would be a nice follow-up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is
other
here known to be a particular type (likeIntervalArray
), or is it something likeUnion[IntervalArray, Series, Index,Interval]
. If it's just IntervalArray it'd be a bit faster to compare withother._left
andright._left
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
at this point
other
can be an Interval or IntervalArrayThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could add copy=False to .astype (not sure how much any of this matters though)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
merge is ok now and can see if this matters on followup