Skip to content

CI: pin sphinx <= 3.1.1 for autodoc failure #35139

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2020
Merged

CI: pin sphinx <= 3.1.1 for autodoc failure #35139

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2020

Conversation

jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

xref #35138

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added CI Continuous Integration Docs labels Jul 6, 2020
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added this to the 1.1 milestone Jul 6, 2020
@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2020
Merged
5 tasks
TomAugspurger
TomAugspurger approved these changes Jul 6, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code checks will fail on this PR, but are fixed on master. We can merge if the doc build passes.

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

Doc build passed. Everything should be good on master.

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger merged commit fdaa5e4 into pandas-dev:master Jul 6, 2020
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche deleted the pin-sphinx branch July 6, 2020 14:35
jbrockmendel pushed a commit to jbrockmendel/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2020
@jorisvandenbossche @jbrockmendel
CI: pin sphinx <= 3.1.1 for autodoc failure (pandas-dev#35139)
c4309b6
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger TomAugspurger approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
CI Continuous Integration Docs
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.1
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jorisvandenbossche @TomAugspurger