Skip to content

Fix issue #35010: Double requirement given for fsspec #35012

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 26, 2020

Conversation

SanthoshBala18
Copy link
Contributor

@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ Other
- Bug in :class:`Tick` comparisons raising ``TypeError`` when comparing against timedelta-like objects (:issue:`34088`)
- Bug in :class:`Tick` multiplication raising ``TypeError`` when multiplying by a float (:issue:`34486`)
- Passing a `set` as `names` argument to :func:`pandas.read_csv`, :func:`pandas.read_table`, or :func:`pandas.read_fwf` will raise ``ValueError: Names should be an ordered collection.`` (:issue:`34946`)

- Fixed bug where two different versions of fsspec is mentioned in requirements-dev.txt (:issue:`35010`)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove this as not needed, fsspec was just added in 1.1

@jreback jreback added the IO Data IO issues that don't fit into a more specific label label Jun 26, 2020
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.1 milestone Jun 26, 2020
@jreback jreback added the Build Library building on various platforms label Jun 26, 2020
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jun 26, 2020

thanks, ping on green.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jun 26, 2020

thanks @SanthoshBala18

@jreback jreback merged commit f5b2e5a into pandas-dev:master Jun 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Build Library building on various platforms IO Data IO issues that don't fit into a more specific label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: Double requirement given for fsspec in requirements-dev.txt
2 participants