-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
DOC - Moving Tips and Trick from wiki to Style Guide - added Reading … #34366
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC - Moving Tips and Trick from wiki to Style Guide - added Reading … #34366
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @vijaysaimutyala generally lgtm.
Hi @VijayantSoni - is this still active? If so, can you address Simon's comment? |
Sorry I somehow missed the comment. I'll add this and update here. |
@MarcoGorelli Updated the PR with comments. Somehow my local build of the docs got pushed. Is there something I should do in future to avoid this or will the local build be ignored ? Also, should I be closing the PR if I don't have any further changes on this or will it be done automatically ? |
Thanks for updating, @vijaysaimutyala !
It's generally safer to stage the files you want to commit with If you could remove the extra files, that'd be great.
should work, I think.
If the core team is happy with it, they'll merge it in :) |
Thanks for the clear answers @MarcoGorelli . Honestly I didn't look at the gitignore but was hoping they would be ignored, but they somehow ended up in my commit. I'll be careful from here on. I'll try out what you've mentioned. Thanks again 🙂 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @vijaysaimutyala, looks like you've successfully removed the unrelated files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @vijaysaimutyala lgtm pending green
I think we can just delete this wiki entry instead of moving it as its pretty outdated. The second code snippet won't run |
see #30964 (comment) The content of this PR is not outdated AFAIK, our standard is to use urlopen and ZipFile from pandas.io.common. This PR documents that? |
Travis CI passed but not updated here. will merge shortly if no objections. |
Does ZipFile even exist? I didn’t see it there maybe overlooked. Thought we just used stdlib
…Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Simon Hawkins ***@***.***> wrote:
Travis CI passed but not updated here. will merge shortly if no objections.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
no it's no longer there. we only have _BytesZipFile now. @vijaysaimutyala can you remove the ZipFile bit. @WillAyd OK with urlopen? I think if we maybe add "Lazy-import wrapper for stdlib urlopen, as that imports a big chunk of |
Sure. Let me know if you want me to add anything else. |
Thanks @vijaysaimutyala . the CI failures are probably unrelated and fixed on master. can you merge upstream/master to get ci to green to be sure. |
…fromr URl and Reading from file named file.txt that's inside of a zip file named file.zip
…der Testing to be consistent
@simonjayhawkins I merged from upstream and everything looks good. How do I get the CI to run again ? |
@vijaysaimutyala if you just push again, the CI process will restart. (terminology nitpick, but it looks like you did a rebase instead of a merge, in which case you would need to do a forced push) |
493ed60
to
6ada273
Compare
Done :) Little confused. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm @WillAyd
Thanks @vijaysaimutyala |
Thanks to you guys for holding my hand throughout. Though this is a small documentation that might not take much time for you, all of you were patient enough for me to understand and move in a proper direction. I use pandas on a daily basis at work and now I'm proud that I too have put in a little effort. Looking forward for big ones 😁 |
This changes referring to #30964 is for removing tips and tricks section page from the wiki to the Code Style guide.
Since this is my first contribution, I've tried to keep this as simple as possible. @simonjayhawkins mentioned that the conventions for urlopen and ZipFile should be captured under our contributing style guide, testing section. I've seen that there is no Testing section and have created a new section and added these two sections from the Wiki post here. Enabling the Travis-CI and Azure CI pipeline build seemed a bit tough for me. I will try to do the build from my side in my next PR.
Let me know if any corrections are needed.