Skip to content

Travis-CI: Allow network cache opt-in for whitelisted forks #3383

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
4 commits merged into from Apr 17, 2013
Merged

Travis-CI: Allow network cache opt-in for whitelisted forks #3383

4 commits merged into from Apr 17, 2013

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Apr 17, 2013

No description provided.

y-p added 4 commits April 17, 2013 15:47
* travis_make_it_faster:
  BLD: use_build_cache.py - fix 2to3 caching and messages
  BLD: travis network cache
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2013
Travis-CI: Allow network cache opt-in for whitelisted forks
@ghost ghost merged commit 7b1e3ce into pandas-dev:master Apr 17, 2013
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Apr 17, 2013

just got travis non-completes for some reason (my local runs fine)....issue with the network caches?

https://travis-ci.org/jreback/pandas/builds/6417035

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Apr 17, 2013

Looks like it. Sorry, will fix asap.

@ghost ghost deleted the travis_make_it_faster branch April 17, 2013 16:05
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Apr 17, 2013

Should be fixed in master now.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Apr 17, 2013

looks good now..thxs...took about 12-14 min for the entire run
https://www.travis-ci.org/jreback/pandas/builds/6421383

what you thought?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Apr 17, 2013

You forgot to say please in the commit message... (and there was a bug ignoring the message body).
Should work now:
https://travis-ci.org/y-p/pandas/builds/6422326

~4 min total.

@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2013
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant