-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
BUG: repair 'style' kwd handling in DataFrame.plot (#21003) #33821
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 16 commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cf9b892
BUG: repair 'style' kwd handling in DataFrame.plot (#21003)
joooeey 20b8b4b
formatting test_frame.py
joooeey fe8dbeb
white space and test issues supposedly fixed
joooeey 12e1d10
more style fixes in core.py
joooeey 948ebab
whatsnew updated
joooeey 40d673b
black
joooeey 04edda5
addressed marco's comments and spelling
joooeey dc9c9cf
Merge branch 'master' into plot-style-error
joooeey 97ec52c
addressed comments by jreback
joooeey d14490f
Merge branch 'plot-style-error' of https://github.com/joooeey/pandas …
joooeey 97ae5ae
adjusted number of blank lines
joooeey 219d8d5
assert lines are correct
joooeey 0c45813
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into plot-style-error
joooeey 18c1f20
combined my tests into one
joooeey 758576b
merged upstream master
joooeey 2c45b97
correct wrong merge conflict solution
joooeey b949814
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into plot-style-error
MarcoGorelli ca39eb5
:pencil2:
MarcoGorelli 59ff00b
check all lines in test
MarcoGorelli 5d63c46
:art:
MarcoGorelli File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since you might need another rebase, just one minor comment, as mentioned in #33821 (comment)
I still prefer to not test only green line but all lines using parametrization, i had an example there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do I need another rebase? I just merged upstream/master 6 days ago which unfortunately left one CI issue. I don't think another rebase will solve that?
Well the function is parametrized I'm testing the inputs
color="green"
andcolor=["yellow", "red", "green", "blue"]
. The only thing is, to simplify the code, I'm only checking the third line, the one that is green for both inputs in the parametrize. I'm confident that this is enough. Checking all four lines would be overkill. After all, checking all four lines (as opposed to the third) would only guard against absurd bugs such as if we suddenly had code that ignored thecolor
kwarg and made every line green.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might do if upstream/master has changed
Regarding the test - unfortunately, absurd bugs do sometimes happen. FWIW, I think the suggestion to check all lines' colours is sensible