-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
BUG: value_counts not working correctly on ExtensionArrays #33674
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jreback
merged 14 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
kotamatsuoka:normalize-value-counts
May 1, 2020
Merged
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
11c26e2
BUG: value_counts not working correctly on ExtensionArrays
kotamatsuoka b025232
Change sum() to ndarray.sum()
kotamatsuoka 7007205
Expand tests
kotamatsuoka af97126
Update test
kotamatsuoka cbabcad
Resolve warning
kotamatsuoka dac1af5
Pass test in Windows py36_np15
kotamatsuoka 0be33fc
Change Int32 to Int64
kotamatsuoka 660bba3
Merge branch 'master' into normalize-value-counts
kotamatsuoka d5eec76
Fix docs
kotamatsuoka db8ea2e
Remove product code update
kotamatsuoka 243d3ec
Remove unnecessary changes
kotamatsuoka 67ee980
split new test
kotamatsuoka 405037f
Update normalize value_counts test
kotamatsuoka 5d54a05
add coments
kotamatsuoka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you revert this back to what it was on master (will need to change the string tests back as well)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If revert, value_counts method return different dtype and need to change many tests. (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dsaxton why/where were these changed to Int64 in the first place?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like it was added here #30824
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jreback this is converted to Int64 on purpose, in the idea that operations on nullable columns should, to the extent possible, also result in new nullable dtypes (similarly as doing a comparison operation with string dtype will give a nullable boolean dtype)