Skip to content

BUG: Groupby quantiles incorrect bins #33200 #33644

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
May 25, 2020
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions doc/source/whatsnew/v1.1.0.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -814,6 +814,7 @@ Groupby/resample/rolling
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrame.resample` where an ``AmbiguousTimeError`` would be raised when the resulting timezone aware :class:`DatetimeIndex` had a DST transition at midnight (:issue:`25758`)
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrame.groupby` where a ``ValueError`` would be raised when grouping by a categorical column with read-only categories and ``sort=False`` (:issue:`33410`)
- Bug in :meth:`GroupBy.first` and :meth:`GroupBy.last` where None is not preserved in object dtype (:issue:`32800`)
- Bug in :meth:`GroupBy.quantile` causes the quantiles to be shifted when the ``by`` axis contains ``NaN`` (:issue:`33200`, :issue:`33569`)
- Bug in :meth:`Rolling.min` and :meth:`Rolling.max`: Growing memory usage after multiple calls when using a fixed window (:issue:`30726`)
- Bug in :meth:`GroupBy.agg`, :meth:`GroupBy.transform`, and :meth:`GroupBy.resample` where subclasses are not preserved (:issue:`28330`)
- Bug in :meth:`GroupBy.rolling.apply` ignores args and kwargs parameters (:issue:`33433`)
Expand Down
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion pandas/_libs/groupby.pyx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -777,7 +777,13 @@ def group_quantile(ndarray[float64_t] out,
non_na_counts[lab] += 1

# Get an index of values sorted by labels and then values
order = (values, labels)
if labels.any():
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is this required for? Do we have a test case when this is False?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mabelvj mabelvj Apr 26, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Normally, if labels are not provided or the dataframe is empty, an error message will rise when applying the quantile. However, there are cases where certain operations lead to empty labels, as when time resampling some types of empty dataframe:

Here is an example of the pipeline:
https://dev.azure.com/pandas-dev/pandas/_build/results?buildId=34258&view=logs&j=bef1c175-2c1b-51ae-044a-2437c76fc339&t=770e7bb1-09f5-5ebf-b63b-578d2906aac9&l=127

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this accounted for in the test that you've created? If not, can you add a test for it?

Copy link
Member

@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins May 20, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add two cases that take the if labels.any(): is False path.

What is this required for?

otherwise labels.max() can raise ValueError: zero-size array to reduction operation maximum which has no identity

# Put '-1' (NaN) labels as the last group so it does not interfere
# with the calculations.
labels_for_lexsort = np.where(labels == -1, labels.max() + 1, labels)
else:
labels_for_lexsort = labels
order = (values, labels_for_lexsort)
sort_arr = np.lexsort(order).astype(np.int64, copy=False)

with nogil:
Expand Down
21 changes: 15 additions & 6 deletions pandas/tests/groupby/test_quantile.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -181,14 +181,23 @@ def test_quantile_missing_group_values_no_segfaults():
grp.quantile()


def test_quantile_missing_group_values_correct_results():
# GH 28662
data = np.array([1.0, np.nan, 3.0, np.nan])
df = pd.DataFrame(dict(key=data, val=range(4)))
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"key, val, expected_key, expected_val",
[
([1.0, np.nan, 3.0, np.nan], range(4), [1.0, 3.0], [0.0, 2.0]),
([1.0, np.nan, 2.0, 2.0], range(4), [1.0, 2.0], [0.0, 2.5]),
(["a", "b", "b", np.nan], range(4), ["a", "b"], [0, 1.5]),
],
)
def test_quantile_missing_group_values_correct_results(
key, val, expected_key, expected_val
):
# GH 28662, GH 33200, GH 33569
df = pd.DataFrame({"key": key, "val": val})

result = df.groupby("key").quantile()
result = df.groupby("key").quantile(0.5)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you add another test that does not explicitly set a quantile (e.g. like the original)

expected = pd.DataFrame(
[1.0, 3.0], index=pd.Index([1.0, 3.0], name="key"), columns=["val"]
expected_val, index=pd.Index(expected_key, name="key"), columns=["val"]
)
tm.assert_frame_equal(result, expected)

Expand Down