-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Added test for #5091 (Missing Periods for some DateOffsets) #33195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
gorogoroumaru
commented
Apr 1, 2020
•
edited by mroeschke
Loading
edited by mroeschke
- closes Missing Periods for some DateOffsets #5091
@@ -106,6 +106,13 @@ def test_asfreq_resample_set_correct_freq(self): | |||
# does .resample() set .freq correctly? | |||
assert df.resample("D").asfreq().index.freq == "D" | |||
|
|||
def test_period_dateoffset_conversion(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you put this test in pandas/tests/indexes/period/test_to_timestamp.py
@@ -106,6 +106,13 @@ def test_asfreq_resample_set_correct_freq(self): | |||
# does .resample() set .freq correctly? | |||
assert df.resample("D").asfreq().index.freq == "D" | |||
|
|||
def test_period_dateoffset_conversion(self): | |||
ts = pd.date_range('1/1/2012', periods=4, freq=pd.offsets.BQuarterEnd()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add the issue number to this test? # GH 5091
per = ts.to_period() | ||
ts_per = per.to_timestamp() | ||
|
||
tm.assert_datetime_array_equal(ts, ts_per) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could use use tm.assert_index_equal
and rename the variables so it reads tm.assert_index_equal(result, expected)
Ah my mistake. When reviewing that issue I too hastily concluded that the issue was solved. Any interest in helping solving the bug? Otherwise, definitely recommend other issues that are tagged |
Thank you, I will try another issue. |