Skip to content

CLN: Consolidate numba facilities #32770

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 19, 2020

Conversation

mroeschke
Copy link
Member

@mroeschke mroeschke commented Mar 17, 2020

  • tests added / passed
  • passes black pandas
  • passes git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff

Precursor to #31845 and other numba engine additions, creates pandas/core/numba_.py (open to move elsewhere) as a shared place for common numba operations like default parameters and jitting functions.

@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 1.1 milestone Mar 17, 2020
@WillAyd
Copy link
Member

WillAyd commented Mar 18, 2020

Maybe better placed in pandas/core/util? @jreback

@mroeschke
Copy link
Member Author

Good point. I can move it to util.

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
"""Common utilities for Numba operations"""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no strong opinion, but should this go in pandas.compat?

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Mar 19, 2020

seems good enough place for now. we can see how / if this grows and move around later. e.g. this is conceptually like pandas/core/computation stuff (though not nearly as big).

@jreback jreback merged commit cfbd7f6 into pandas-dev:master Mar 19, 2020
@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the groupby_transform_engine branch March 19, 2020 03:49
SeeminSyed pushed a commit to CSCD01-team01/pandas that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2020
jbrockmendel pushed a commit to jbrockmendel/pandas that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2020
jbrockmendel pushed a commit to jbrockmendel/pandas that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants