-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
REF: implement nanops.na_accum_func #32597
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@TomAugspurger thoughts on whether we're going to do a 1.0.3? if so i should hold off on refactors like this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TomAugspurger thoughts on whether we're going to do a 1.0.3? if so i should hold off on refactors like this
this is for 1.1 right?
pandas/core/nanops.py
Outdated
@@ -1497,3 +1497,62 @@ def nanpercentile( | |||
return result | |||
else: | |||
return np.percentile(values, q, axis=axis, interpolation=interpolation) | |||
|
|||
|
|||
def na_accum_func(values, accum_func, skipna: bool): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you add a doc-string
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated+green
I'm not sure if we're doing a 1.0.3. Will talk about it on the call today.
…On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:46 PM Jeff Reback ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
@TomAugspurger <https://github.com/TomAugspurger> thoughts on whether
we're going to do a 1.0.3? if so i should hold off on refactors like this
this is for 1.1 right?
------------------------------
In pandas/core/nanops.py
<#32597 (comment)>:
> @@ -1497,3 +1497,62 @@ def nanpercentile(
return result
else:
return np.percentile(values, q, axis=axis, interpolation=interpolation)
+
+
+def na_accum_func(values, accum_func, skipna: bool):
can you add a doc-string
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#32597?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAKAOIVVSZIWQKSDNGM73RDRG33RFA5CNFSM4LFIRB5KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOCYZQZ5I#pullrequestreview-372444405>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKAOIXADB3VJZCG723LK6DRG33RFANCNFSM4LFIRB5A>
.
|
thanks |
this is a follow-up that was requested a few months ago