Skip to content

Backport PR #32242 on branch 1.0.x (BUG: Fixed bug, where pandas._libs.lib.maybe_convert_objects function improperly handled arrays with bools and NaNs) #32552

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

meeseeksmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Backport PR #32242: BUG: Fixed bug, where pandas._libs.lib.maybe_convert_objects function improperly handled arrays with bools and NaNs

…maybe_convert_objects function improperly handled arrays with bools and NaNs
@lumberbot-app lumberbot-app bot added this to the 1.0.2 milestone Mar 9, 2020
@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

I think the azure failure is from https://dev.azure.com/pandas-dev/pandas/_build/results?buildId=30283&view=logs&j=5291ec4e-9543-503b-43ce-895cf0e06ba3&t=ba0a2b35-e1f8-54df-fd66-2b9fde6f4b1f&l=38. statsmodel's DNS service was having issues earlier today, perhaps that's related.

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

@WillAyd
Copy link
Member

WillAyd commented Mar 10, 2020

Hmm what's the point of that repo? Looks like the travis config needs updating (still using Python 3.5?) maybe a conflict in requirements is responsible

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

The failures at https://travis-ci.org/pandas-dev/pandas/jobs/660210730?utm_medium=notification&utm_source=github_status are more concerning.

That points to a green build ?

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, I restarted it :)

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

Going to merge this, since all the CI failures should have resolved themselves.

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger merged commit f6381a3 into pandas-dev:1.0.x Mar 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants