Skip to content

DOC: Remove absolute urls from the docs #32539

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Mar 12, 2020
Merged

DOC: Remove absolute urls from the docs #32539

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 22 commits
Commits
Show all changes
24 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
d0a3171
Initial commit
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
7bd7acd
minor change
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
5f5bba8
minor changes
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
f4af3bd
Adding some more files
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
1110e71
Adding some more files
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
942986d
minor changes
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
e55cf6a
Updating cookbook timeseries alias
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
61731e3
changes to cookbook
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
41509b5
cookbook changes
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
adbc35b
Updating timeseries offset links
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
e168fff
PR comments updates
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
a6b9927
adding whatsnew docs
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 8, 2020
77171e1
updating whatsnew docs
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
1fd0987
updating whatsnew docs
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
63a67e5
updating whatsnew docs
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
c61c4b0
adding whatsnew docs
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
a90c640
updating whatsnew docs
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
5239174
updating whatsnew docs
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
2e6d4c6
updating comparison with sql doc
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
3f18268
updating indexing docs
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
4833835
PR comments
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
f1d3e2e
PR comments
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 9, 2020
68bed39
PR comments
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 10, 2020
fc03dfe
PR comments
ArkadeepAdhikari Mar 12, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion doc/source/getting_started/comparison/comparison_with_sql.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Filtering in SQL is done via a WHERE clause.
LIMIT 5;

DataFrames can be filtered in multiple ways; the most intuitive of which is using
`boolean indexing <https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/indexing.html#boolean-indexing>`_.
:ref:`boolean indexing <indexing.boolean>`

.. ipython:: python

Expand Down
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions doc/source/user_guide/cookbook.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -794,8 +794,7 @@ The :ref:`Resample <timeseries.resampling>` docs.
`Time grouping with some missing values
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33637312/pandas-grouper-by-frequency-with-completeness-requirement>`__

`Valid frequency arguments to Grouper
<https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/timeseries.html#offset-aliases>`__
Valid frequency arguments to Grouper :ref:`Timeseries <timeseries.offset_aliases>`

`Grouping using a MultiIndex
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41483763/pandas-timegrouper-on-multiindex>`__
Expand Down
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions doc/source/user_guide/indexing.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -675,8 +675,7 @@ Current behavior
Passing list-likes to .loc with any non-matching elements will raise
KeyError in the future, you can use .reindex() as an alternative.

See the documentation here:
https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/indexing.html#deprecate-loc-reindex-listlike
See the documentation :ref:`here <indexing.deprecate_loc_reindex_listlike>`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is also an output from pandas, not an actual link that we want to change, isn't it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this looks like a similar case, @jorisvandenbossche can you confirm?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes


Out[4]:
1 2.0
Expand Down
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions doc/source/whatsnew/v0.21.0.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -469,8 +469,7 @@ Current behavior
Passing list-likes to .loc or [] with any missing label will raise
KeyError in the future, you can use .reindex() as an alternative.

See the documentation here:
https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/indexing.html#deprecate-loc-reindex-listlike
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is also code output that should be left alone

See the documentation :ref:`here <indexing.deprecate_loc_reindex_listlike>`

Out[4]:
1 2.0
Expand Down