BUG: retain tz in to_records #32535
Merged
BUG: retain tz in to_records #32535
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…-internal_get_values-frame
…-internal_get_values-frame
…-internal_get_values-frame
…-internal_get_values-frame
|
whatsnew added + green |
jreback
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2020
| @@ -18,6 +25,16 @@ def test_to_records_dt64(self): | |||
| result = df.to_records()["index"][0] | |||
| assert expected == result | |||
|
|
|||
| def test_to_records_dt64tz_column(self): | |||
| df = DataFrame({"A": date_range("2012-01-01", "2012-01-02", tz="US/Eastern")}) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if you can add the issue numbe here
…-internal_get_values-frame
…-internal_get_values-frame
SeeminSyed
pushed a commit
to CSCD01-team01/pandas
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2020
* BUG: retain tz in to_records * whatsnew * woops * comment
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
plus the initial motivation: get rid of two of our
_internal_get_valuescalls (of which i count 16 left in master)